Last Updated: | 11/23/2015 10:00 PM |
Time | Coral Gallery Ballroom | Poster Area (Coral Gallery) |
Sunday, December 13 |
||
09:30 AM-10:50 AM | T1: Tutorial 1 (Part 1) | |
11:10 AM-12:30 PM | T1: Tutorial 1 (Part 2) | |
12:30 PM-02:00 PM | Lunch break (not included in registration) | |
02:00 PM-03:20 PM | T2: Tutorial 2 (Part 1) | |
03:40 PM-05:00 PM | T2: Tutorial 2 (Part 2) | |
05:00 PM-07:00 PM | SC: Student paper contest | |
07:00 PM-09:00 PM | Welcome Reception in Sunrise Terrace | |
Monday, December 14 |
||
08:45 AM-09:00 AM | OC: Opening ceremony | |
09:00 AM-10:00 AM | P1: Plenary 1: Prof. J.M.F. Moura | |
10:00 AM-12:00 PM | RS1: Convex optimization and computational algebra, SS1: Super-resolution and atomic norms, SS2: Sparse time-frequency analysis, SS3: Network data and graph signal processing |
|
12:00 PM-1:30 PM | Workshop Lunch in La Joya Restaurant | |
04:30 PM-05:30 PM | P2: Plenary 2: Prof. P. Flandrin | |
05:30 PM-07:30 PM | RS2: Radar signal processing, RS3: Hyperspectral imaging, SS4: Tensor-based signal processing, SS5: MmWave array signal processing |
|
Tuesday, December 15 |
||
09:00 AM-10:00 AM | P3: Plenary 3: Prof. P.K. Varshney | |
10:00 AM-12:00 PM | RS4: Signal and information processing over networks, RS5: EEG systems, SS6: Cognitive/Multi-missions radars, SS7: Nonconvex optimization in sparse inverse problems for multidimensional signal processing |
|
12:00 PM-1:30 PM | Workshop Lunch in La Joya Restaurant | |
02:00 PM-04:00 PM | SAM Technical Committee Meeting in Coral Garden 3 | |
04:30 PM-05:30 PM | P4: Plenary 4: Prof. R.G. Baraniuk | |
05:30 PM-07:30 PM | RS6: DOA and TDOA estimation, SS10: Randomness and efficient computation in signal processing, SS8: Optimization and adaptivity in Big Data, SS9: Massive MIMO systems |
|
08:00 PM-10:30 PM | Workshop Banquet in Isla Contoy Restaurant | |
Wednesday, December 16 |
||
09:00 AM-10:00 AM | P5: Plenary 5: Dr. Y.I. Abramovich | |
10:00 AM-12:00 PM | RS7: Sparse signal processing and recovery, RS8: MIMO systems, RS9: Performance bounds, SS11: Computer-intensive methods for statistical signal processing, SS12: Large-scale optimization in dynamic scenarios |
|
12:00 PM-1:30 PM | Workshop Lunch in La Joya Restaurant |
Traditionally, in engineering, dynamic systems are lumped systems described by an ordinary or partial differential or difference equation. In many recent applications of interest, for example, in large scale networked infrastructures, in social networks, in populations, systems are networks of possibly simple components or agents, and the system (network) state evolves through local interactions among its components. We explore methods to study the dynamics of these network processes and how to derive the system global behaviors that arise from the local interactions among the system components. (Work with June Zhang.)
Graphs are ubiquitous for representing interactions in networks, be they physical, biological or social. Whereas numerous studies are intended to develop methods for analyzing signals over graphs, it will here be shown how the analysis of graph structures themselves can be performed by using tools borrowed from signal processing. The core of the approach is to build a distance map from the adjacency matrix of a graph, from which a collection of signals can be obtained thanks to a multidimensional scaling technique. Spectral features of the so-obtained signals can then be derived, with distinctive features for graph structures of different natures (regular, Erdös-Rényi, communities, scale-free, etc.). Various issues related to this perspective will be discussed, including efficient ways of inverting the transformation on the basis of a few components only, thus paving the way for « graph filtering ». An extension to dynamic graphs will also be considered, in which the time evolution of spectral features defines a matrix that can be factorized non-negatively. (Based on joint work with R. Hamon, P. Borgnat and C. Robardet.)
In this talk, we discuss the problem of Byzantines in the context of Distributed Inference Networks. Distributed inference networks have many applications including military surveillance, cognitive radio networks and smart grid. A distributed inference network typically consists of local sensors sending information to a central processing unit (known as the Fusion Center) that is responsible for inference. The network may contain malicious sensors that may engage in data falsification which can result in a wrong inference at the Fusion Center. Drawing parallel to the "Byzantine Generals Problem", the local sensors are the generals who try to make a decision in the presence of traitors called "Byzantines". We present an overview of recent research on this problem. Discussion includes the susceptibility of distributed inference networks to Byzantines, and then the possible protection of these networks through mitigation of Byzantines. A game theoretic formulation of the problem is also discussed. Several applications are considered and some avenues for further research are provided.
A grand challenge in machine learning is the development of computational algorithms that match or outperform humans in perceptual inference tasks that are complicated by nuisance variation. For instance, visual object recognition involves the unknown object position, orientation, and scale in object recognition while speech recognition involves the unknown voice pronunciation, pitch, and speed. Recently, a new breed of deep learning algorithms have emerged for high-nuisance inference tasks that routinely yield pattern recognition systems with near- or super-human capabilities. But a fundamental question remains: Why do they work? Intuitions abound, but a coherent framework for understanding, analyzing, and synthesizing deep learning architectures has remained elusive. We answer this question by developing a new probabilistic framework for deep learning based on the Deep Rendering Model: a generative probabilistic model that explicitly captures latent nuisance variation. By relaxing the generative model to a discriminative one, we can recover two of the current leading deep learning systems, deep convolutional neural networks and random decision forests, providing insights into their successes and shortcomings, a principled route to their improvement, and new avenues for exploration.
In this talk, we present results of theoretical and experimental signal-to-external noise ratio (SENR) performance assessment for optimal (adaptive) beamforming in uniform rectangular (oversampled) antenna arrays (URA’s) with inter-element spacing smaller than one half-wavelength. These arrays are considered as alternatives to a conventional one-dimensional uniform linear array (ULA) when in a quest for a significant enhancement of SENR the aperture of such a ULA becomes impractically long. In the case of uniform external noise distribution, the definitions of SENR gain with respect to an input (per element) SENR, and the antenna array directivity, coincide. Therefore, any SENR gains delivered by the optimum (vs. conventional) beamforming should be attributed to superdirective properties of these oversampled two-dimensional (2D) URA’s. In addition to this uniform external noise distribution, we introduce several “tapered” noise distributions associated with the propagating phenomenology of high frequency (HF) noise over ionospheric channels in surfacewave (SW) and skywave over-the-horizon radars (OTHR). This talk also explores the Cramér-Rao bound (CRB) for azimuth (Az) and elevation (El) direction-of-arrival (DOA) estimation and specifies the role of superdirectivity in DOA estimation accuracy enhancement. We demonstrate that for relatively small antenna arrays used in SWOTHR applications, the oversampled 2D URA can significantly outperform 1D ULA’s with the same number of elements and inter-element spacing. Oversampled 2D URA’s utilized for advanced skywave OTHR applications deliver SENR and DOA estimation accuracy that approaches the performance of a 1D ULA with the same large number of antenna elements, but with impractical large apertures. Other benefits of 2D antenna arrays, associated with the improved selectivity in elevation, are not considered in this analysis which is focused on radar performance in strong external noise environments, typical for “night-time” skywave OTHR operation.