Learning the MMSE Channel Estimator

You are here

Top Reasons to Join SPS Today!

1. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine
2. Signal Processing Digital Library*
3. Inside Signal Processing Newsletter
4. SPS Resource Center
5. Career advancement & recognition
6. Discounts on conferences and publications
7. Professional networking
8. Communities for students, young professionals, and women
9. Volunteer opportunities
10. Coming soon! PDH/CEU credits
Click here to learn more.

Learning the MMSE Channel Estimator

Thursday, July 22, 2021
David Neumann, Thomas Wiese, Wolfgang Utschick

Contributed by David Neumann, Thomas Wiese and Wolfgang Utschick and based on the article, Learning the MMSE Channel Estimator, published in the IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 66, pp. 2905-2917, 2018, and the SPS webinar by the same title, Learning the MMSE Channel Estimator, available on the SPS Resource Center.

Accurate channel estimation is a major challenge in the next generation of wireless communication networks. To fully exploit setups with many antennas, estimation errors must be kept small. This can be achieved by exploiting the structure inherent in the channel vectors. For example, line-of-sight paths result in highly correlated channel coefficients. In realistic scenarios, such a correlation structure is present but rather difficult to exploit ad hoc, since not only the channel realization itself but also its statistical properties are random variables, for example depending on the position of transmitters and receivers in the scenario.

Let us assume for a moment that we know the "correct" stochastic channel model for our system, for example conditioned on a particular position in the scenario. We could go ahead and calculate the minimum mean squared error (MMSE) channel estimator with respect to that model. This estimator is given as the expected value of the channel vector with respect to the conditional channel distribution. In particular, it is a *function* that maps the training data to the channel estimate, and this function is determined by the channel model and its parameters. For example, with Gaussian channels, the estimator is a linear function of the observations, i.e., given as a matrix-vector multiplication. The corresponding matrix needs to be calculated only once and depends on the parameters of the distribution, e.g., its covariance, given we know these parameters of the conditional stochastic channel model. In many practical cases, however, we do not know these conditional models, but only their priors. In these cases, the channel estimator becomes a nonlinear function of the observations, such that the estimation matrix then results as an integral of weighted matrices of the linear case, where the weights are functions of the observations itself. Such a solution is generally very demanding in terms of numerical complexity and often turns out to be intractable.

Instead of calculating the MMSE estimator analytically, we can find it numerically: We first generate a set of training data - channel vectors and observations - from our conditional channel model or through a long-term collection of measurements and then use an optimization algorithm to compute the function that minimizes the empirical squared estimation error, i.e., the empirical risk. The numerical approach has advantages compared to the analytical approach: In the conditional Gaussian example, we could restrict the search space even further to obtain a matrix with which we can express the matrix-vector multiplication as a convolution. The resulting estimator would be optimal in the class of all convolutional estimators of a given dimension. For this estimator, no closed-form analytical solution is available. For non-Gaussian models, it is often not possible to compute the analytical solution at all and the numerical approach is the only option.

Function approximation is also the subject of Deep Learning and it stands to reason that tools from this field can also be used for channel estimation. The design of the neural network determines the class of functions that can be used for the estimator. We have shown in [1] that under simplifying conditions, the MMSE estimator for the conditional normal channel model closely resembles the architecture of a typical neural network with two layers and a "softmax" activation function. By means of numerical optimization, a learning algorithm, the errors introduced by the simplifying assumptions are then reduced so that we obtain an estimator that represents a good compromise between numerical and statistical efficiency.

Using a realistic model as the starting point for the design of a neural network is one way to exploit tools from deep learning without foregoing all domain knowledge. In addition to network design, we found such knowledge also helpful to craft an initialization strategy for the learning algorithm. More generally, we believe that there are other challenging problems in communications engineering for which deep learning could be a powerful new ingredient.


[1] D. Neumann, T. Wiese, and W. Utschick, “Learning the MMSE channel estimator,” IEEE Trans. on Signal Process., vol. 66, pp. 2905–2917, 2018, doi: 10.1109/TSP.2018.2799164.




SPS on Twitter

  • RT : Call for Short Course proposals! in collaboration with the Education Board is planning education… https://t.co/N97XTEgIg8
  • This Wednesday, join the Information Forensics and Security Technical Committee Webinar Series when Dr. Richard Heu… https://t.co/ORdtuq5SlQ
  • Our Biomedical Imaging and Signal Processing Webinar Series continues on Tuesday, 5 July when Michael Unser present… https://t.co/7bYh8ZPHI0
  • Join us TODAY at 11:00 AM ET when the Brain Space Initiative Talk Series continues with Dr. Tianming Liu presenting… https://t.co/MEfnzk6dAE
  • Our 75th anniversary is approaching in 2023, and we're celebrating with a Special Issue of IEEE Signal Processing M… https://t.co/U6UNv8kLSO

SPS Videos

Signal Processing in Home Assistants


Multimedia Forensics

Careers in Signal Processing             


Under the Radar