Learning Wireless Networks' Footprints and Topologies in Shared Spectrum (2017)

You are here

Inside Signal Processing Newsletter Home Page

Top Reasons to Join SPS Today!

1. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine
2. Signal Processing Digital Library*
3. Inside Signal Processing Newsletter
4. SPS Resource Center
5. Career advancement & recognition
6. Discounts on conferences and publications
7. Professional networking
8. Communities for students, young professionals, and women
9. Volunteer opportunities
10. Coming soon! PDH/CEU credits
Click here to learn more.

10 years of news and resources for members of the IEEE Signal Processing Society

Learning Wireless Networks' Footprints and Topologies in Shared Spectrum (2017)

Laghate, Mihir Vijay. (University of California, Los Angeles)

Advisor:  Cabric, Danijela

The increasing demand for wireless connectivity and the scarcity of spectrum for exclusive use have popularized the idea of multiple communication systems to share spectrum. For a network to estimate its own link budget while avoiding interference from neighboring, or incumbent, networks, it needs to learn the incumbent networks' spatial, spectral, and temporal usage patterns. Instead of manually modifying the standard of each network to ensure such a coexistence, they can, as proposed by Mitola and Haykin, build learning or cognitive abilities into the radios themselves and automate the process. In this work, they propose methods for such a cognitive network to cooperatively learn the spatial and spectral occupancy of incumbent users (IUs) and the topologies of the incumbent networks. In contrast to the existing literature on spectrum sensing, this work studies the problems of detecting, distinguishing, and coexisting with multiple communicating incumbent networks rather than that of avoiding interference to single broadcasting transmitters. Their methods are designed to make these inferences without prior knowledge of the number of IUs, their locations, network topologies, transmission protocols, and channel models of the ambient wireless environment. They also do not require knowledge of the locations of the cognitive radios (CRs).

They begin with a conventional cooperative spectrum sensing scenario where the CR network fuses binary reports from multiple CRs to infer the spectral occupancy of a single intermittently transmitting IU. They show that though a second a priori unknown IU or interferer would cause correlations in the CR reports and this correlation structure can be learned, it is not possible to distinguish whether the correlations are caused by another IU, channel correlations, or malicious intent. Instead, they propose learning the correlation structure and then use this structure to infer the spectrum occupancy of the single IU.

Next, they propose algorithms to learn the footprint of each incumbent transmitter, i.e., the sets of CRs that receive signals from that incumbent transmitter. By learning the Gaussian mixture distribution of the received energy vector, they show that multiple transmitters' footprints can be learnt irrespective of their spatial overlap and potentially anisotropic shape.

Learning the footprints also enables sampling the activity of each incumbent radio. By identifying radios that transmit a response to the transmission of another, they learn the causal links between pairs of incumbent radios, i.e., the topologies of the incumbent networks. Hence, they can identify the potential receivers when a particular incumbent radio is transmitting and the cognitive network can potentially avoid interference to these receivers.

Finally, they consider the problem of detecting frequency bands occupied by intermittent transmitters using a single antenna wideband sensor. Using only power spectrum measurements, they first automatically learn the noise power spectrum of the sensor and then learn the frequency bands occupied by the received signals even if they are partially overlapping.

In summary, this dissertation proposes methods for radio scene analysis of communicating incumbent networks by using received energy and power spectrum measurements.

Table of Contents:

SPS on Facebook

SPS on Twitter

  • most humans are introduced to sps concepts in little league, if you paid attention
  • I always thought his countenance was exquisitely friendly and mellow. Unlike Hilbert who ap… https://t.co/DGj7QsClEe
  • Happy Fourier’s birthday, born OTD in 1768. Not sure how to celebrate? If you’ve listened to an mp3 or watched a… https://t.co/7pGeqLSGqB

SPS Videos

Signal Processing in Home Assistants


Multimedia Forensics

Careers in Signal Processing             


Under the Radar