Automated FDK-Filter Selection for Cone-Beam CT in Research Environments

You are here

Top Reasons to Join SPS Today!

1. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine
2. Signal Processing Digital Library*
3. Inside Signal Processing Newsletter
4. SPS Resource Center
5. Career advancement & recognition
6. Discounts on conferences and publications
7. Professional networking
8. Communities for students, young professionals, and women
9. Volunteer opportunities
10. Coming soon! PDH/CEU credits
Click here to learn more.

Automated FDK-Filter Selection for Cone-Beam CT in Research Environments

By: 
Marinus J. Lagerwerf; Willem Jan Palenstijn; Holger Kohr; Kees Joost Batenburg

Users of X-ray (micro-)CT in research environments often study many different types of objects, with many different research questions. For each new scan, the settings of the scan (number of angles, dose, cone angle) are chosen by the user, often based on how much time is available, the dose sensitivity of the sample, and geometrical characteristics of the particular CT-scanner that is used. The FDK algorithm is the most common reconstruction method used for circular cone-beam data. Its filter is typically chosen based on characteristics of the object, the scan parameters, and task-specific metrics. This imposes a problem for case-by-case research use, as selecting an optimal filter requires manual and subjective user choices as well as considerable expertise. In this article we present a computationally efficient and automated method to compute an FDK-filter for a given measured projection dataset that is optimal with respect to an objectively defined quality criterion that is based on the difference between the measured projection data and the computed projections of the reconstructed volume. We show that for a variety of objects, scan settings (number of angles and noise levels), and tasks (porosity quantification, threshold-based segmentation), the FDK-filters computed by our approach yield accurate results in terms of several different metrics that are comparable to filters manually selected for the experiments.

SPS on Twitter

SPS Videos


Signal Processing in Home Assistants

 


Multimedia Forensics


Careers in Signal Processing             

 


Under the Radar