1. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine
2. Signal Processing Digital Library*
3. Inside Signal Processing Newsletter
4. SPS Resource Center
5. Career advancement & recognition
6. Discounts on conferences and publications
7. Professional networking
8. Communities for students, young professionals, and women
9. Volunteer opportunities
10. Coming soon! PDH/CEU credits
Click here to learn more.
10 years of news and resources for members of the IEEE Signal Processing Society
Interview with Shiv Dutt Joshi, Professor, IIT Delhi, India
Shiv Dutt Joshi received the B.E. degree (Hons.) in electrical and electronics engineering from the Birla Institute of Technology, Pilani, India, in 1981, and the M.Tech. degree in communications and radar engineering and the Ph.D. degree in signal processing from IIT Delhi, New Delhi, India, in 1983 and 1988, respectively. He is currently a Professor with the Electrical Engineering Department, IIT Delhi.
His research interests include the development of fast algorithms for stochastic signal processing, speech processing, modeling of stochastic processes, and group theoretical approach to signal processing.
Q. Please tell us about your recent work in the area of signal processing.
Response: From the beginning, the focus of my research has been on optimum signal representation/processing. Although my research students have contributed on a variety of topics, I would like to mention three of them due to my personal interest. The first research thread, to which a number of my research students contributed, is a culmination to the concept of Signal matched Filter-banks. A multi-rate filter-bank is composed of two parts: one is the analysis side of the filter-bank and the other is called synthesis side of the filter-bank. Whenever one talks about a multi-rate filter-bank, it invariably implies a Perfect Reconstruction Filter-Bank (PRFB) where the output signal is a delayed version of the input signal. Here, we have proposed a Signal matched analysis Filter-bank, which is nothing but a single-input multiple-output whitening filter.
The idea behind the synthesis side was that when we are dealing with a particular signal or a particular class of signals, why we should reconstruct every signal under the sky. In fact, our focus should be on reconstruction of only the given signal or the given class of signals. This led to the concept of Signal matched Synthesis Filter-bank. Combining the two, we obtain the Signal Matched Filter bank. The second work is about Fourier Decomposition Method (FDM). General understanding in the literature is that Fourier based methods are not suitable for processing non-stationary signals. We found that it is not so. In this work, we have proposed a Fourier-based method, termed as FDM, for decomposing non-stationary signals which can be effectively used for time-frequency analysis of such signals. The last but not the least is the work of one of my Ph.D. students who proposed the notion of Functorial Signal representation and base-structured categories. I am specifically mentioning this work as this has set the tone for my future theoretical research which for some time got stuck in group theory (global invariance) rather than local invariance (Category/Groupoid perspective).
Q. Would you please share any of your impactful work with us?
Response: Some of our (myself along-with my research students) contributions, that I would like to highlight (as mentioned earlier though my research students have contributed in a variety of topics this list is biased towards my personal intrinsic interests) are as follows: 1) the work on FDM, which can be used for time-frequency analysis of non-stationary signals; 2) the notion of Signal matched Filter bank (SMFB) and associated fast algorithm for filtering and modeling. FDM and most of the other time-frequency analysis methods are block processed. This implies that one has to take block of data (frame) and perform the analysis, a variant form of SMFB, termed by us as Analytic Signal matched filet bank, can be used to perform truly adaptive time-frequency analysi; and 3) The third work is about base-structured categories for signal representation, which in my personal opinion, would go a long way.
Q. Do you think there are some learnings for us from COVID-19 pandemic with regards to engineering education, particularly, signal processing education?
Response: COVID-19 experience is going to change the world forever as never before. As and when the so-called normalcy returns, it would be a new normal. Whether we like it or not, we will have to learn to live with this new normal. As far education is concerned, people like me who have special liking for chalk and board type of teaching, contrasted with power-point presentation and involving other modern gadgets, would be worst affected. But any change brings with it new challenges and opportunities. In my opinion, augmented reality based algorithms and platforms would play a pivotal role in making the online class experience as good as real class-room experience in times to come.
Q. In your opinion, what are some of the most exciting areas of research in signal processing for students and upcoming researchers?
Response: I have been working in the area of signal processing for about four decades now but still feel that I know very little. Although there are many interesting areas of research related to signal processing, with my limited knowledge, experience and understanding, I would like to mention some of them. Needless to say my personal bias is clearly visible in the choice of topics. There are two fronts on which future Signal Processing research would be focused. One on the theoretical side and other related to applications. On the theoretical side I would like to mention at least three areas that I find exciting (needless to say my bias is clearly visible).
First: Most practical signals are not 1-D. Whether it is Geophysical Signals of biomedical signals such as EEG, or Audio etc. Most of the time we process such signals treating them multi-variate signals. The signals which are actually distributed in time and space should be handled in that way only. In my personal opinion, Graph Signal processing, by incorporating suitable flexibility, can provide the right framework to model spatio-temporal dynamics. Second area that I find interesting is optimum sampling. The Nyquist sampling/reconstruction is confined to Linear and Time-Invariant processing (operators) only. By expanding the scope of processing to non-linear and/or time varying domains, it would be interesting to investigate as to how much samples can be traded with complexity of processing. Needless to say, the intrinsic invariances of the underlying phenomenon being modeled would play a key role.
The last but not the least is the Functorial Signal representation. Most signal modeling approaches use some algebraic/topological structure of the signal space. Modeling it as base-structured category, proposed by one of my students, in my opinion would be a very interesting direction to explore as is does away with that constraint and be effectively used to model local invariances. Processing of Geophysical and Bio-medical signals/images (X-Ray, MRI, EEG, ECG, fMRI, Ultra-sound etc.) are a very rich application areas for researchers working in Signal processing with its own typicality. Processing of such signals can provide new application as well as theoretical challenges.
|The First TReNDS Neuroimaging Competition is Live!||29 June 2020|
|Call for Nominations: Chair, Women in Signal Processing Committee and Chair, Young Professionals Committee||10 July 2020|
|ALASKA 2 Steganalysis Challenge is Open||13 July 2020|
|Nominations Open for 2020 SPS Awards||1 September 2020|
|Call for Nominations: SPS Chapter of the Year Award||15 October 2020|
© Copyright 2020 IEEE – All rights reserved. Use of this website signifies your agreement to the IEEE Terms and Conditions.
A not-for-profit organization, IEEE is the world's largest technical professional organization dedicated to advancing technology for the benefit of humanity.