Physics-Embedded Machine Learning for Electromagnetic Data Imaging: Examining three types of data-driven imaging methods

You are here

Top Reasons to Join SPS Today!

1. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine
2. Signal Processing Digital Library*
3. Inside Signal Processing Newsletter
4. SPS Resource Center
5. Career advancement & recognition
6. Discounts on conferences and publications
7. Professional networking
8. Communities for students, young professionals, and women
9. Volunteer opportunities
10. Coming soon! PDH/CEU credits
Click here to learn more.

Physics-Embedded Machine Learning for Electromagnetic Data Imaging: Examining three types of data-driven imaging methods

By: 
Rui Guo; Tianyao Huang; Maokun Li; Haiyang Zhang; Yonina C. Eldar

Electromagnetic (EM) imaging is widely applied in sensing for security, biomedicine, geophysics, and various industries. It is an ill-posed inverse problem whose solution is usually computationally expensive. Machine learning (ML) techniques and especially deep learning (DL) show potential in fast and accurate imaging. However, the high performance of purely data-driven approaches relies on constructing a training set that is statistically consistent with practical scenarios, which is often not possible in EM-imaging tasks. Consequently, generalizability becomes a major concern. On the other hand, physical principles underlie EM phenomena and provide baselines for current imaging techniques. To benefit from prior knowledge in big data and the theoretical constraint of physical laws, physics-embedded ML methods for EM imaging have become the focus of a large body of recent work.

Electromagnetic (EM) imaging is widely applied in sensing for security, biomedicine, geophysics, and various industries. It is an ill-posed inverse problem whose solution is usually computationally expensive. Machine learning (ML) techniques and especially deep learning (DL) show potential in fast and accurate imaging. However, the high performance of purely data-driven approaches relies on constructing a training set that is statistically consistent with practical scenarios, which is often not possible in EM-imaging tasks. Consequently, generalizability becomes a major concern. On the other hand, physical principles underlie EM phenomena and provide baselines for current imaging techniques. To benefit from prior knowledge in big data and the theoretical constraint of physical laws, physics-embedded ML methods for EM imaging have become the focus of a large body of recent work.

This article surveys various schemes to incorporate physics in learning-based EM imaging. We first introduce background on EM imaging and basic formulations of the inverse problem. We then focus on three types of strategies combining physics and ML for linear and nonlinear imaging and discuss their advantages and limitations. Finally, we conclude with open challenges and possible ways forward in this fast-developing field. Our aim is to facilitate the study of intelligent EM-imaging methods that will be efficient, interpretable, and controllable.

SPS on Twitter

  • Our 75th anniversary celebration continues -- March trivia is now live! Take the trivia before 6 April for the chan… https://t.co/5ajuy7OZkP
  • The Brain Space Initiative Talk Series continues on Friday, 31 March when Dr. Dean Salisbury presents "From searchi… https://t.co/jvnsJ6jX7K
  • On 26 April, join Dr. Preeti Kumari, Dr. Nitin Jonathan Myers, and Dr. Robert W. Heath Jr. for a new SPS Webinar, "… https://t.co/x5Mm6Djvmz
  • We have several 75th anniversary activities in store for - join SPS leaders in conversation about the p… https://t.co/nsPV0a5RW5
  • Join us on 7 April 2023 when Dr. Chao Zuo presents "Lens-Free On-Chip Digital Holographic Microscopy: Resolution An… https://t.co/Bklm6qy6zp

SPS Videos


Signal Processing in Home Assistants

 


Multimedia Forensics


Careers in Signal Processing             

 


Under the Radar